JZK breach NZ court rules potentially prejudicing trial

Free PDF Downloads of Key documents relating to the NZ and US lawsuits
User avatar
David McCarthy
Site Admin
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:09 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

JZK breach NZ court rules potentially prejudicing trial

Unread post by David McCarthy » Mon Jun 23, 2014 10:33 pm

JZ Knight breach NZ court rules potentially prejudicing trial.

JZK NZ breach of court rules PDF Download
http://freepdfhosting.com/a1ad4685d9.pdf
-------Original Message-------

From: EMF
Date: 5/7/2014 5:13:49 AM
To: Earl.Gray@simpsongrierson.com
Cc: Joanne.Dickson@simpsongrierson.com; Tracey.Walker@simpsongrierson.com
Subject: plaintiffs breach of court rules

Dear Earl,

I serve notice the plaintiffs are in breach of NZ court rules.
Recently the plaintiffs reported to the public via newspaper articles untrue and blatantly misleading statements alleging I made in court document under oath.
NZ high court rules require both parties must first give consent to make court documents available to the public.
I gave no such consent.
I made no such statements.
I call upon the plaintiffs to retract these false statements immediately.

I look forward to hearing from you in this matter.

Regards

David


Quotes:
Knight issued this statement:
"Through court documents filed by the other parties, we have now received admissions by both Virginia Coverdale and David McCarthy that the RSE videos they disseminated had first been edited.
Virginia hired a video editor to create what she wanted from the original material. David, who owns a video editing company, did the editing himself to create the impressions he wanted, including altering audio tracks from the original video recordings.
To get to this point has taken a lot of time, money, and effort to reveal the lengths to which our critics have gone to cast us in a false light in order to support their vitriolic agenda, having an effect on so many lives.
Only when put under oath in litigation did we finally get the truth."
Yelm Community Blog
http://www.yelmcommunity.org/
RSE released a statement disputing the accuracy of the allegedly bigoted videos.
By BRAD SHANNON
OlympianApril 30, 2014
“It has taken a lot of effort to reveal the lengths to which our critics have gone to cast JZ Knight in a false light in order to support their vitriolic agenda. Only when put under oath in litigation did we finally get the truth. “Court documents are available for public inspection in Thurston County in the case against Virginia Coverdale and in the New Zealand High Court in Auckland in the case against David McCarthy. JZK, Inc. received admissions by both defendants that the videos they disseminated in 2012 had first been edited. Virginia hired a video editor to create what she wanted. David did the editing himself to create the impressions he wanted, including altering audio tracks from the original video recordings. “Our critics aren’t happy that the truth contradicts the image of the 'evil demon' they promulgate. To them, Democratic officials had been corrupted or fooled by JZ Knight but not our critics. They wouldn’t let facts distract them so they ignore the conclusions of competent authorities and become vigilantes. “There is a way to find truth in our courts of law. In the courts, justice is served against vigilantes who lie, slander, and abuse the public trust. And just like in November 2012, the public won’t forget who has abused their trust.
http://www.thenewstribune.com
http://www.thenewstribune.com/2014/04/3 ... 65000.html

The News Tribunehttp://www.thenewstribune.com/2014/04/30/31733 ... 65000.html

http://www.yelmonline.com/news/local_ne ... f887a.html

_______________________________________________________
JZ Knight Donates $65K to Co. Democrats
Republicans Call Money Tainted Due to Controversial Ramtha Video

Posted: Friday, May 2, 2014 3:51 pm
RSE released a statement disputing the accuracy of the allegedly bigoted videos.
“Court documents are available for public inspection in Thurston County in the case against Virginia Coverdale and in the New Zealand High Court in Auckland in the case against David McCarthy,” the statement reads. “JZK, Inc. received admissions by both defendants that the videos they disseminated in 2012 had first been edited. Virginia hired a video editor to create what she wanted. David did the editing himself to create the impressions he wanted, including altering audio tracks from the original video recordings.”

A spokesperson for the Southern Poverty Law Center told the Nisqually Valley News they would be releasing more information about the matter in the coming weeks, but couldn’t comment further.
Donations Knight made to several Democratic candidates in October 2012 came under fire after Virginia Coverdale — a former student of Knight’s Ramtha’s School of Enlightenment, who is currently in litigation with the school — released a YouTube video showing Knight making disparaging remarks about Catholics, Jews and gays while purportedly channeling 35,000-year-old warrior Ramtha.
The school contends the statements were taken out of context.



-------Original Message-------

From: Joanne Dickson
Date: 5/8/2014 3:23:34 PM
To: 'EMF'
Cc: Tracey Walker; Earl Gray
Subject: Plaintiffs' media release [SG-SGDMS.FID510890]

Dear David
Thank you for your email.
The plaintiffs do not accept that they have done anything wrong. Your admission as to editing was made in the statement of defence and the High Court Rules do not bar the parties from referring to their contents. However, our clients also appreciate the potential for some readers and media to misunderstand what our clients intended. With that in mind, and bearing in mind the current settlement discussions, they are issuing a new statement. That statement appears below for your information:
On April 29, we made a statement about admissions made by both Virginia Coverdale and David McCarthy in Court proceedings. We want to clarify that the statement as to editing by Virginia Coverdale in the Washington case was made under oath. The admission by Mr McCarthy that he edited RSE videos before disseminating them was not made under oath but in his statement of defence which the public is entitled to access.
We know from our own scrutiny of the videos that David, who owns a video editing business, has edited the videos to create the impressions he wanted, including altering audio tracks from the original video recordings.
This clarification does not change the fact that, it has taken a lot of time, money and effort to reveal the lengths to which our critics have gone to cast us in a false light in order to support their vitriolic agenda, having an effect on so many lives.
Regards

Joanne Dickson
Senior Associate
Simpson Grierson
Level 27, 88 Shortland Street, Private Bag 92518, Auckland, New Zealand
DDI +64-9-977 5223 | Fax +64-9-977 5028 | Mobile +64-21 926 640
joanne.dickson@simpsongrierson.com | http://www.simpsongrierson.com
Related:
NZ Court Documents David McCarthy NZ Statement of Defense 12 March 2014 PDF Download
http://freepdfhosting.com/2556af9654.pd
But he has nothing on at all, cried at last the whole people....

Post Reply

Return to “Key NZ and US lawsuits Document Free PDF Downloads”