Corona virus COVID-19- hype and hysteria? Demystification of the nightmare! - Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakd

EMF does not buy into the fear hysteria of COVID-19,
nor agree with the agenda of mandatory mRNA vaccinations.
User avatar
David McCarthy
Site Admin
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:09 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Corona virus COVID-19- hype and hysteria? Demystification of the nightmare! - Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakd

Unread post by David McCarthy » Sat Apr 04, 2020 5:29 am

The fallout and deaths caused by 'social distancing' and economies collapsing will be massive.
And prove to be far more destructive, with livelihoods and lives lost than the Covid-19 flu virus will ever cause.
Please take a moment to listen to Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi - Infectious Disease Specialist from Germany. .
Its always wise to look all sides of 'life and death' issues don't you think?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBB9bA- ... e=emb_logo

-CENSORED- by YouTube :sad:

David

Video Screenshot
the unintended fallout from social distancing and the economy's collapse.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
But he has nothing on at all, cried at last the whole people....

User avatar
David McCarthy
Site Admin
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:09 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Corona virus COVID-19- hype and hysteria? Demystification of the nightmare! - Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakd

Unread post by David McCarthy » Sat Apr 04, 2020 5:32 am

Related:
An essay by Stanford University epidemiologist John Ioannidis.
Stanford epidemiologist warns that coronavirus crackdown is based on bad data
Greg Piper - Associate Editor •March 19, 2020

‘Like an elephant being attacked by a house cat’

“If we had not known about a new virus out there, and had not checked individuals with PCR [virus] tests, the number of total deaths due to ‘influenza-like illness’ would not seem unusual this year. At most, we might have casually noted that flu this season seems to be a bit worse than average.”

This was not written by some right-wing crank claiming coronavirus is a conspiracy to deny President Trump a second term, or an excuse to bring down capitalism.

It’s from a sobering and illuminating essay by Stanford University epidemiologist John Ioannidis, co-director of its Meta-Research Innovation Center, published in the life sciences news site STAT.

The coronavirus-driven crackdowns on public life by state and local political leaders are being made in a data vacuum, Ioannidis warns, and extreme government measures to prevent infections may actually lead to more deaths.

“The current coronavirus disease, Covid-19, has been called a once-in-a-century pandemic,” he says. “But it may also be a once-in-a-century evidence fiasco,” with policymakers relying on “meaningless” statistics based on unreliable samples:

Three months after the outbreak emerged, most countries, including the U.S., lack the ability to test a large number of people and no countries have reliable data on the prevalence of the virus in a representative random sample of the general population. …

Patients who have been tested for SARS-CoV-2 [COVID-19] are disproportionately those with severe symptoms and bad outcomes. As most health systems have limited testing capacity, selection bias may even worsen in the near future.

The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher.

The general ignorance of journalists when it comes to reporting scientific research is making the response worse.

Consider the complicating factors when trying to project that one cruise ship’s mortality rate “onto the age structure of the U.S. population”: It’s based on seven deaths, in a population (tourists) that “may have different frequencies of chronic diseases” than the general population.

The “reasonable estimates” for the general population range from 0.05 percent to 1 percent (the elderly tourist cruise line death rate), Ioannidis writes:

A population-wide case fatality rate of 0.05% is lower than seasonal influenza. If that is the true rate, locking down the world with potentially tremendous social and financial consequences may be totally irrational. It’s like an elephant being attacked by a house cat. Frustrated and trying to avoid the cat, the elephant accidentally jumps off a cliff and dies.

https://www.thecollegefix.com/stanford-epidemiologist.../
But he has nothing on at all, cried at last the whole people....

User avatar
David McCarthy
Site Admin
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:09 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Corona virus COVID-19- hype and hysteria? Demystification of the nightmare! - Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakd

Unread post by David McCarthy » Sat Apr 04, 2020 5:35 am

OK..I'll stop here..
Sweden's resistance to lockdown raises questions about our own tough approach
https://news.yahoo.com/swedens-resistan ... soc_trk=fb
But he has nothing on at all, cried at last the whole people....

User avatar
David McCarthy
Site Admin
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:09 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re:The Coronavirus Conspiracy: How COVID-19 Will Seize Your Rights & Destroy Our Economy - David Icke - London Real

Unread post by David McCarthy » Thu Apr 09, 2020 10:21 pm

Has a doomsday cult has taken over mainstream media?
Here's the heading from TV News here in NZ...
"Why New Zealand's Covid-19 death rate remains low compared to other countries"

What are they talking about here? Thousands?..nope, Hundreds...nope, One? Yep..its one death of a woman in her 70s.. :-?
more than likely this lady already had major health issues and a compromised immune system to the Flu virus.
OK David Icke..never thought I would support this man in any way shape or form..too much of a conspiracy theorist for my taste.
I do not agree with everything David has to say, but as time moves on and witnessing the Covid hysteria he sounds more and more credible.
Worth taking the time to listen to the man and make your own mind up....its not like we don't have the time right now ay?
I also fear the Covid-19 lie may prove to be the most destructive act of deception ever perpetuated on our society, and if so, for what purpose?
Here's a clue...right now the worlds mainstream media groups are heralding a pandemic-triggered global economic shock and banking crash
bigger than anything the world has know... but here's the truth..
This so called crash was inevitable. It goes hand in hand with the world environmental crashes.
The Covid-19's origin, timing and spread is 'a false flag' created by the Corporate Banking Elites and their faceless masters..
who are successfully deflecting attention from their greed, inhumanity, failures and deceptions.
These powerful sociopaths have been wrestling for control over the human society and wreaking havoc and destruction for hundreds of years.... perhaps even thousand..
Unfortunately millions of good people have unwittingly drank the Covid-19 Kool-aid ...
Now the closet sociopaths are polishing their jackboots ready to march the streets rounding up dissenters.
WE have choice to dig deeper...Like I said..I do not necessary agree with everything David Icke has to say.
or, are you still drinking the Covid Koolaid? Does anyone else feel the way I do?
Just sharing..
its called free speech folks... give it a try.. Wait!! whats that I hear? Jackboots on the streets? :sad:
This storm will pass.
Be wise, be kind, be courageous.

David

The Coronavirus Conspiracy: How COVID-19 Will Seize Your Rights & Destroy Our Economy - David Icke - London Real
https://londonreal.tv/the-coronavirus-c ... avid-icke/
But he has nothing on at all, cried at last the whole people....

User avatar
David McCarthy
Site Admin
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:09 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Corona virus COVID-19- hype and hysteria? Demystification of the nightmare! - Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakd

Unread post by David McCarthy » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:15 am

NZ Headline News today..wait for it...!
We have a second death apparently caused by Covid-19 according to the NZ Health Ministry.
The woman was in her 90s living in a rest home... she had common 'age-related conditions' prior to 'testing positive'. :roll:
Why am I posting this stuff on EMF?
This has so many disturbing parallels to RSE and cult control mind tactics in general.
To take something innocuous and turn it into a weapon of fear and control.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/413 ... -confirmed

Mind Control Psychology
Social psychology tactics
[1] "Mind control is the process by which individual or collective freedom of choice and action is compromised by agents or agencies that modify or distort perception, motivation, affect, cognition and/or behavioral outcomes. Mind control | Psychology Wiki |
But he has nothing on at all, cried at last the whole people....

User avatar
David McCarthy
Site Admin
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:09 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Corona virus COVID-19- hype and hysteria? Demystification of the nightmare! - Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakd

Unread post by David McCarthy » Fri Apr 10, 2020 10:06 pm

More from Professor Sucharit Bhakdi
Professor Sucharit Bhakdi asks 5 critical questions concerning Covid-19 to Angela Merkel - Dorset Eye
https://dorseteye.com/professor-suchari ... la-merkel/

Professor Sucharit Bhakdi asks 5 critical questions concerning Covid-19 to Angela Merkel
By
Dorset Eye
-
1st April 2020
46
0
An Open Letter from Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology at the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, to the German Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel. Professor Bhakdi calls for an urgent reassessment of the response to Covid-19 and asks the Chancellor five crucial questions. The let­ter is dated March 26. This is an unofficial translation.

Dear Chancellor,

As Emeritus of the Johannes-Gutenberg-University in Mainz and longtime director of the Institute for Medical Microbiology, I feel obliged to critically question the far-reaching restrictions on public life that we are currently taking on ourselves in order to reduce the spread of the COVID-19 virus.

It is expressly not my intention to play down the dangers of the virus or to spread a political message. However, I feel it is my duty to make a scientific contribution to putting the current data and facts into perspective – and, in addition, to ask questions that are in danger of being lost in the heated debate.

The reason for my concern lies above all in the truly unforeseeable socio-economic consequences of the drastic containment measures which are currently being applied in large parts of Europe and which are also already being practiced on a large scale in Germany.

My wish is to discuss critically – and with the necessary foresight – the advantages and disadvantages of restricting public life and the resulting long-term effects.

To this end, I am confronted with five questions which have not been answered sufficiently so far, but which are indispensable for a balanced analysis.

I would like to ask you to comment quickly and, at the same time, appeal to the Federal Government to develop strategies that effectively protect risk groups without restricting public life across the board and sow the seeds for an even more intensive polarization of society than is already taking place.

With the utmost respect,

Prof. em. Dr. med. Sucharit Bhakdi

1. STATISTICS
In infectiology – founded by Robert Koch himself – a traditional distinction is made between infection and disease. An illness requires a clinical manifestation. [1] Therefore, only patients with symptoms such as fever or cough should be included in the statistics as new cases.

In other words, a new infection – as measured by the COVID-19 test – does not necessarily mean that we are dealing with a newly ill patient who needs a hospital bed. However, it is currently assumed that five percent of all infected people become seriously ill and require ventilation. Projections based on this estimate suggest that the healthcare system could be overburdened.

My question: Did the projections make a distinction between symptom-free infected people and actual, sick patients – i.e. people who develop symptoms?

2. DANGEROUSNESS
A number of coronaviruses have been circulating for a long time – largely unnoticed by the media. [2] If it should turn out that the COVID-19 virus should not be ascribed a significantly higher risk potential than the already circulating corona viruses, all countermeasures would obviously become unnecessary.

The internationally recognized International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents will soon publish a paper that addresses exactly this question. Preliminary results of the study can already be seen today and lead to the conclusion that the new virus is NOT different from traditional corona viruses in terms of dangerousness. The authors express this in the title of their paper “SARS-CoV-2: Fear versus Data.” [3]

My question: How does the current workload of intensive care units with patients with diagnosed COVID-19 compare to other coronavirus infections, and to what extent will this data be taken into account in further decision-making by the federal government? In addition: Has the above study been taken into account in the planning so far? Here too, of course, „diagnosed“ means that the virus plays a decisive role in the patient’s state of illness, and not that previous illnesses play a greater role.

3. DISSEMINATION
According to a report in the Süddeutsche Zeitung, not even the much-cited Robert Koch Institute knows exactly how much is tested for COVID-19. It is a fact, however, that a rapid increase in the number of cases has recently been observed in Germany as the volume of tests increases. [4]

It is therefore reasonable to suspect that the virus has already spread unnoticed in the healthy population. This would have two consequences: firstly, it would mean that the official death rate – on 26 March 2020, for example, there were 206 deaths from around 37,300 infections, or 0.55 percent [5] – is too high; and secondly, it would mean that it would hardly be possible to prevent the virus from spreading in the healthy population.

My question: Has there already been a random sample of the healthy general population to validate the real spread of the virus, or is this planned in the near future?

4. MORTALITY
The fear of a rise in the death rate in Germany (currently 0.55 percent) is currently the subject of particularly intense media attention. Many people are worried that it could shoot up like in Italy (10 percent) and Spain (7 percent) if action is not taken in time.

At the same time, the mistake is being made worldwide to report virus-related deaths as soon as it is established that the virus was present at the time of death – regardless of other factors. This violates a basic principle of infectiology: only when it is certain that an agent has played a significant role in the disease or death may a diagnosis be made. The Association of the Scientific Medical Societies of Germany expressly writes in its guidelines: „In addition to the cause of death, a causal chain must be stated, with the corresponding underlying disease in third place on the death certificate. Occasionally, four-linked causal chains must also be stated.“ [6]

At present there is no official information on whether, at least in retrospect, more critical analyses of medical records have been undertaken to determine how many deaths were actually caused by the virus.

My question: Has Germany simply followed this trend of a COVID-19 general suspicion? And: is it intended to continue this categorisation uncritically as in other countries? How, then, is a distinction to be made between genuine corona-related deaths and accidental virus presence at the time of death?

5. COMPARABILITY
The appalling situation in Italy is repeatedly used as a reference scenario. However, the true role of the virus in that country is completely unclear for many reasons – not only because points 3 and 4 above also apply here, but also because exceptional external factors exist which make these regions particularly vulnerable.

One of these factors is the increased air pollution in the north of Italy. According to WHO estimates, this situation, even without the virus, led to over 8,000 additional deaths per year in 2006 in the 13 largest cities in Italy alone. [7] The situation has not changed significantly since then. [8] Finally, it has also been shown that air pollution greatly increases the risk of viral lung diseases in very young and elderly people. [9]

Moreover, 27.4 percent of the particularly vulnerable population in this country live with young people, and in Spain as many as 33.5 percent. In Germany, the figure is only seven percent [10]. In addition, according to Prof. Dr. Reinhard Busse, head of the Department of Management in Health Care at the TU Berlin, Germany is significantly better equipped than Italy in terms of intensive care units – by a factor of about 2.5 [11].

My question: What efforts are being made to make the population aware of these elementary differences and to make people understand that scenarios like those in Italy or Spain are not realistic here?

References:

[1] Fachwörterbuch Infektionsschutz und Infektionsepidemiologie. Fachwörter – Definitionen – Interpretationen. Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin 2015. (abgerufen am 26.3.2020) [2] Killerby et al., Human Coronavirus Circulation in the United States 2014–2017. J Clin Virol. 2018, 101, 52-56 [3] Roussel et al. SARS-CoV-2: Fear Versus Data. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 105947 [4] Charisius, H. Covid-19: Wie gut testet Deutschland? Süddeutsche Zeitung. (abgerufen am 27.3.2020) [5] Johns Hopkins University, Coronavirus Resource Center. 2020. (abgerufen am 26.3.2020) [6] S1-Leitlinie 054-001, Regeln zur Durchführung der ärztlichen Leichenschau. AWMF Online (abgerufen am 26.3.2020) [7] Martuzzi et al. Health Impact of PM10 and Ozone in 13 Italian Cities. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. WHOLIS number E88700 2006 [8] European Environment Agency, Air Pollution Country Fact Sheets 2019, (abgerufen am 26.3.2020) [9] Croft et al. The Association between Respiratory Infection and Air Pollution in the Setting of Air Quality Policy and Economic Change. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2019, 16, 321–330. [10] United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Living Arrange­ments of Older Persons: A Report on an Expanded International Dataset (ST/ESA/SER.A/407). 2017 [11] Deutsches Ärzteblatt, Überlastung deutscher Krankenhäuser durch COVID-19 laut Experten unwahrscheinlich, (abgerufen am 26.3.2020)
Source:

Open Letter from Professor Sucharit Bhakdi to German Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel
But he has nothing on at all, cried at last the whole people....

User avatar
David McCarthy
Site Admin
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:09 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Bhakdi/Burkhardt pathology results show 93% of people who died after being vaccinated were killed by the vaccine

Unread post by David McCarthy » Mon Feb 14, 2022 6:23 am

Bhakdi/Burkhardt pathology results show 93% of people who died after being vaccinated were killed by the vaccine

Dr Sucharit Bhakdi: Organs Of Dead Vaccinated Proves Auto Immune Attack - 22/12/2021



The authors did an autopsy in 15 patients who died (from 7 days to 6 months) after receiving the COVID vaccine. These were all cases where the coroner ruled as NOT being caused by the vaccine.They discovered that in 14 of the 15 patients there was widespread evidence of the body attacking itself, something that is never seen before. The heart was attacked in all 14 cases.
A number of salient aspects dominated in all affected tissues of all cases:
inflammatory events in small blood vessels (endotheliitis), characterized by an abundance of T-lymphocytes and sequestered, dead endothelial cells within the vessel lumen;
the extensive perivascular accumulation of T-lymphocytes;
a massive lymphocytic infiltration of surrounding non-lymphatic organs or tissue with T-lymphocytes.
Lymphocytic infiltration occasionally occurred in combination with intense lymphocytic activation and follicle formation. Where these were present, they were usually accompanied by tissue destruction.
Here’s the video presentation of the results.
VAERS as well as other independent studies (e.g., see this vaccine injury paper) shows the vaccines are killing people and that cardiac events were highly elevated. This study is consistent with those results.
This work independently validates the analysis of Peter Schimacher who showed a minimum of 30% to 40% of the deaths after vaccine were caused by the vaccine.

Background of two of the scientists behind the study
Dr. Suchrit Bhakdi has spent his life practicing, teaching and researching medical microbiology and infectious diseases. He chaired the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany, from 1990 until his retirement in 2012. He has published over 300 research articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology and parasitology, and served from 1990 to 2012 as Editor-in-Chief of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, one of the first scientific journals of this field that was founded by Robert Koch in 1887.
Dr. Arne Burkhardt is a pathologist who has taught at the Universities of Hamburg, Berne and Tübingen. He was invited for visiting professorships/study visits in Japan (Nihon University), the United States (Brookhaven National Institute), Korea, Sweden, Malaysia and Turkey. He headed the Institute of Pathology in Reutlingen for 18 years. Subsequently, he worked as an independent practicing pathologist with consulting contracts with laboratories in the US. Burkhardt has published more than 150 scientific articles in German and international scientific journals as well as contributions to handbooks in German, English and Japanese. Over many years he has audited and certified institutes of pathology in Germany.

Dr Sucharit Bhakdi: Organs Of Dead Vaccinated Proves Auto Immune Attack - 22/12/2021
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fHIT55iM4Zv9/



But he has nothing on at all, cried at last the whole people....

User avatar
David McCarthy
Site Admin
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:09 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

German Chief Pathologist Sounds Alarm on Fatal Covid Vaccine Injuries

Unread post by David McCarthy » Mon Feb 14, 2022 6:37 am

German Chief Pathologist Sounds Alarm on Fatal Covid Vaccine Injuries
“Jab is Cause of Death in 30-40% of Autopsies of Recently Vaccinated”

The Expose | September 13, 2021
The director of the Pathological Institute of the University of Heidelberg, Peter Schirmacher, has carried out over forty autopsies on people who died within two weeks of receiving a Covid-19 vaccine and has expressed alarm over his findings.

Schirmacher stated that 30 to 40 per cent of people he examined died from the vaccine and that in his opinion, the frequency of fatal consequences of vaccinations is “underestimated.”

Following his findings, Schirmacher has called for more autopsies of vaccinated people to further determine whether the vaccines are linked to deaths. He has warned that the high number of unreported cases of vaccination deaths is partially due to the fact that “pathologists do not notice anything about most of the patients who die after and possibly from a vaccination.”

Despite raising the alarm surrounding the vaccines, many have criticised Schirmacher’s conclusions, with the Paul Ehrlich Institute calling the director’s statements “incomprehensible.” The Chancellor’s lackey, senior German immunologist Thomas Mertens dismissed the findings right away: “I don’t know of any data that would allow a justifiable statement to be made here and I am not assuming an unreported number.”

The immunologist Christian Bogdan from the Erlangen University Hospital, a member of the Standing Vaccination Commission (STIKO), also contradicted Schirmacher’s assumption of a “high number of unreported vaccination complications or even deaths.”

Despite the criticism, Schirmacher did receive support from his own ranks, and the Federal Association of German Pathologists stated that more autopsies of vaccinated people who died within a certain time frame after vaccination should be performed.

The head of the “Autopsy Working Group” in this association wanted to make general practitioners and health authorities aware of this. Basically, doctors of the patients who die within a few days or weeks post-vaccination should apply for an autopsy in case of doubt or the health authorities should take action,

The Federal Association of Pathologists already requested this in March in a letter to Health Minister Jens Spahn (CDU), but it went unanswered.

Of course, it’s worth noting that Schirmacher’s warning could cause various pharmaceutical companies to lose billion dollars worth of long-term business, which explains why his findings have been scrutinised and tarnished by the pro-vaccine agenda.

However, the reputation and seriousness of Schirmacher cannot be ignored.

Schirmacher himself is already leading an autopsy project on people who have died from Covid-19, which is subsidised by the state. He himself then expanded the focus and began performing autopsies on more than 40 deceased vaccinated people. Whilst his results only represent a small sample size, it is a worrying representation of a bigger picture: 30 to 40 per cent died from vaccination itself. The pathologist cited “rare, severe side effects of the vaccination – such as cerebral vein thrombosis or autoimmune diseases.”

In response to critics, Schirmacher denied a lack of competence, stating: “The colleagues are definitely wrong because they cannot assess this specific question competently.” Additionally, the director said that he is not trying to fearmonger and is not opposed to vaccinations, as he himself has received the jab.

It won’t be a surprise to see in the coming weeks Schirmacher’s reputation completely torn to shreds in the media, online and in the scientific and medical community.

Share this:

https://alethonews.com/2021/09/29/germa ... -injuries/
But he has nothing on at all, cried at last the whole people....

User avatar
David McCarthy
Site Admin
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:09 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Corona virus COVID-19- hype and hysteria? Demystification of the nightmare! - Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakd

Unread post by David McCarthy » Wed Mar 30, 2022 9:39 pm

YouTube Covid Censorship.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
But he has nothing on at all, cried at last the whole people....

User avatar
David McCarthy
Site Admin
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:09 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Corona virus COVID-19- hype and hysteria? Demystification of the nightmare! - Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakd

Unread post by David McCarthy » Wed Mar 30, 2022 9:59 pm

Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi: Are We Being Told the Truth About COVID-19? - Triggernometry
HERE > https://www.bitchute.com/video/7DmCk0rbIspn/
But he has nothing on at all, cried at last the whole people....

Post Reply

Return to “Covid 19 Pandemic - mRNA Vaccine Safety - Lockdowns”