mRNA Vaccine Safety - Fertility - Menses irregularities - Blood-clotting - Immune Escape +

EMF does not buy into the fear hysteria of COVID-19,
nor agree with the agenda of mandatory mRNA vaccinations.
User avatar
David McCarthy
Site Admin
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:09 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

mRNA Vaccine Safety - Fertility - Menses irregularities - Blood-clotting - Immune Escape +

Unread post by David McCarthy » Sun May 02, 2021 10:37 pm

Halt Covid Vaccine, Prominent Scientist Tells CDC - April 23, 2021

Before these mRNA gene therapy vaccines were introduced
I remember reading articles by leading Immunologists who were trying to warn the world of the risk of associated with these vaccines.
After decades of illustrious scientific careers, they were all berated, belittled and vilified and censored.
Now another research scientist Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay is brave enough to speak out...
I strongly feel that all the gene therapy vaccines must be halted immediately due to safety concerns on several fronts.
Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay. Doctorate in biochemistry and molecular biology from the University of Texas, over 30 years of scientific experience, primarily in toxicology and mechanistic biology.
Quotes....
"First, there is a credible reason to believe that the CV V will cross-react with the syncytin and reproductive proteins in sperm, ova, and placenta, LEADING TO IMPAIRED FERTILITY AND IMPAIRED REPRODUCTIVE AND GESTATIONAL OUTCOMES.
"Respected virologist Dr. Bill Gallaher, Ph.D., made excellent arguments as to why you would expect cross reaction. Due to beta sheet conformation similarities between spike proteins and syncytin-1 and syncytin-2.
"I HAVE YET TO SEE A SINGLE IMMUNOLOGICAL STUDY WHICH DISPROVES THIS. Despite the fact that it would literally take the manufacturers a single day to do these syncytin studies to ascertain this [once they had serum from vaccinated individuals].
It’s been over a year since the assertions were first made that this [the body attacking its own syncytin proteins due to similarity in spike protein structure] could occur."


Halt Covid Vaccine, Prominent Scientist Tells CDC
In a public comment to the CDC, molecular biologist and toxicologist Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay, Ph.D., called to immediately halt Covid vaccine production and distribution. Citing fertility, blood-clotting concerns (coagulopathy), and immune escape, Dr. Lindsay explained to the committee the scientific evidence showing that the coronavirus vaccines are not safe.
On April 23, 2021, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices held a meeting in Atlanta, Georgia. The focus of this ACIP meeting was blood clotting disorders following Covid vaccines. Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay spoke to the CDC during the time set aside for public comment.
The censorship on social media in particular and the internet in general is relentless. Here is a slightly edited, annotated censorship-proof transcript of Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay’s 3-minute comment.

You can listen to her testimony on YouTube here (for now, anyway. If this link goes viral, YouTube will likely censor it).
Molecular Biologist and Toxicologist Calls to Halt Covid Vaccine
Hi, my name is Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay. I hold a doctorate in biochemistry and molecular biology from the University of Texas, and have over 30 years of scientific experience, primarily in toxicology and mechanistic biology.
In the mid-1990s, I aided the development of a temporary human contraceptive vaccine which ended up causing unintended autoimmune ovarian destruction and sterility in animal test models. Despite efforts against this and sequence analyses that did not predict this.
I strongly feel that all the gene therapy vaccines must be halted immediately due to safety concerns on several fronts.
Janci Chunn Lindsay: Covid vaccines could induce cross-reactive antibodies to syncytin, and impair fertility as well as pregnancy outcomes
First, there is a credible reason to believe that the Covid vaccines will cross-react with the syncytin and reproductive proteins in sperm, ova, and placenta, leading to impaired fertility and impaired reproductive and gestational outcomes.
Respected virologist Dr. Bill Gallaher, Ph.D., made excellent arguments as to why you would expect cross reaction. Due to beta sheet conformation similarities between spike proteins and syncytin-1 and syncytin-2.

I have yet to see a single immunological study which disproves this. Despite the fact that it would literally take the manufacturers a single day to do these syncytin studies to ascertain this [once they had serum from vaccinated individuals]. It’s been over a year since the assertions were first made that this [the body attacking its own syncytin proteins due to similarity in spike protein structure] could occur.
Pregnancy losses reported to VAERS lead to demand to halt Covid vaccine
We have seen 100 pregnancy losses reported in VAERS as of April 9th. And there have [also] been reports of impaired spermatogenesis and placental findings from both the natural infection, vaccinated, and syncytin knockout animal models that have similar placental pathology, implicating a syncytin-mediated role in these outcomes.
Additionally, we have heard of multiple reports of menses irregularities in those vaccinated. These must be investigated.
We simply cannot put these [vaccines] in our children who are at .002% risk for Covid mortality, if infected, or any more of the child-bearing age population without thoroughly investigating this matter.
[If we do], we could potentially sterilize an entire generation. Speculation that this will not occur and a few anecdotal reports of pregnancies within the trial are not sufficient proof that this is not impacting on a population-wide scale.
Covid vaccine causes blood disorders
Secondly, all of the gene therapies [Covid vaccines] are causing coagulopathy. [Coagulopathy when the body’s blood clotting system is impaired.] This is not isolated to one manufacturer. And this is not isolated to one age group.
As we are seeing coagulopathy deaths in healthy young adults with no secondary comorbidities.
There have been 795 reports related to blood clotting disorders as of April 9th in the VAERS reporting system, 338 of these being due to thrombocytopenia.

There are forward and backward mechanistic principles for why this is happening. The natural infection is known to cause coagulopathy due to the spike protein. All gene therapy vaccines direct the body to make the spike protein. Zhang et al in [a scientific paper published in the Journal of Hematology & Oncology] in September 2020 showed that if you infuse spike protein into mice that have humanized ACE-2 receptors on blood platelets that you also get disseminated thrombosis.
Spike protein incubated with human blood in vitro also caused blood clot development which was resistant to fibrinolysis. [Fibrinolysis is the body’s process of breaking down blood clots]. The spike protein is causing thrombocytic events, which cannot be resolved through natural means. And all vaccines must be halted in the hope that they can be reformulated to guard against this adverse effect.
Third, there is strong evidence for immune escape—

At this point in her oral testimony, Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay was interrupted by a man’s voice: “Thank you for your comment, your time has expired.”
I reached out to Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay to find out what else she had wanted to share with ACIP, in addition to her concerns over fertility and blood-clotting disorders. She sent me back her third point, which she submitted as written testimony.
Third, there is strong evidence for immune escape, and that inoculation under pandemic pressure with these leaky vaccines is driving the creation of more lethal mutants that are both newly infecting a younger age demographic, and causing more Covid-related deaths across the population than would have occurred without intervention. That is, there is evidence that the vaccines are making the pandemic worse.
It is clear that we are seeing a temporal immune depression immediately following the inoculations [see World Meter Global Covid deaths counts following inoculation dates] and there are immunosuppressive regions on spike proteins, as well as Syn-2, that could be likely causing this, through a T-cell mediated mechanism. If we do not stop this vaccine campaign until these issues can be investigated, we may see a phenomenon such as we see in chickens with Marek’s disease.

We have enough evidence now to see a clear correlation with increased Covid deaths and the vaccine campaigns. This is not a coincidence. It is an unfortunate unintended effect of the vaccines. We simply must not turn a blind eye and pretend this is not occurring. We must halt all Covid vaccine administration immediately, before we create a true pandemic that we cannot reign in.
MIT scientist also concerned about blood-clotting, fertility issues
Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., an expert in protein synthesis, believes that Dr. Lindsay’s hypothesis is correct. “I absolutely share these concerns,” Dr. Seneff, who is a senior research scientist at MIT, wrote to me in a sobering email.
“The potential for blood clotting disorders and the potential for sterilization are only part of the story. There are other potential long-term effects of these vaccines as well, such as autoimmune disease and immune escape, whereby the vaccines administered to immune-compromised people accelerate the mutation rate of the virus so as to render both naturally acquired and vaccine-induced antibodies no longer effective.”
Like Dr. Lindsay, Dr. Seneff believes we need to immediately halt Covid vaccine campaigns. “This massive clinical trial on the general population could have devastating and irreversible effects on a huge number of people,” Seneff explains.
Despite these fertility and blood disorder concerns, the CDC panel voted last Friday to resume the use of the Johnson and Johnson vaccine. They did, however, suggest an FDA warning label be added. Their argument against halting Covid vaccination? The CDC believes the benefits outweigh the risks.

About Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay
Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay is the Director of Toxicology and Molecular Biology for Toxicology Support Services, LLC. She holds a doctorate in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from the University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center-Houston. Dr. Lindsay has extensive experience in analyzing the molecular profile of pharmacologic responses. Her expertise centers on evaluating the complex dynamics of toxicity, such as toxicant pharmacology, exposure route, host metabolism, and subsequent cellular effects as they relate to the contribution of specific substances to impairment, health and fertility risk, and human disease.

About Jennifer Margulis, Ph.D.
Jennifer Margulis, Ph.D., is an investigative journalist, book author, and Fulbright awardee. She is the author of Your Baby, Your Way: Taking Charge of Your Pregnancy, Childbirth, and Parenting Decisions for a Happier, Healthier Family, co-author (with Paul Thomas, M.D.) of The Vaccine-Friendly Plan, and The Addiction Spectrum: A Compassionate, Holistic Approach to Recovery. Follow her on Facebook, Twitter, and Pinterest.


https://www.jennifermargulis.net/halt-covid-vaccine.../...
But he has nothing on at all, cried at last the whole people....

User avatar
David McCarthy
Site Admin
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:09 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: mRNA vaccine safety. Fertility - Menses irregularities - Blood-clotting - Immune Escape +

Unread post by David McCarthy » Sun May 02, 2021 10:56 pm

Related:
Retired Microbiologist Dr Sucharit Bhakdi
IS THE mRNA VACCINE DANGEROUS?

It is being said everywhere that the mRNA vaccine is not dangerous. The reason is that
only the information for a small part of the virus, the so-called "spike protein", is introduced into our body and
nothing else is simulated than what nature would also do. When our cells are attacked, the viruses also release their genetic material, so that our cells become “virus factories”.
So basically everything shouldn't be a problem? But! A respiratory infection takes place in the airways. If, in the worst case, cell death occurs, the damage can be repaired relatively easily through tissue renewal.
When vaccinated, however, the virus information is injected into the muscle. Many believe that the packaged virus genes remain at the injection site - i.e. in the muscles. The genes would be taken up by cells on site, which is where most of the “virus factories” would be built. Side effects such as swelling, redness and pain at the puncture site would therefore be expected, but they were relatively harmless and went away after a few days. A fatal mistake!
The virus genes from the manufacturers Moderna and Biontech / Pfizer are packaged in “lipid nanoparticles” - these are tiny packages, not made of paper, but of fatty substances. This will protect the content and make it easier for our body's cells to absorb. The packaging itself means that the risk of severe allergic reactions is many times higher than with conventional vaccines (21).
It is not for nothing that warnings are now being given that people with allergies should not be vaccinated - life-threatening reactions (anaphylaxis) could be triggered.

Indeed, in some vaccine volunteers, such dangerous side effects have required emergency treatment. In addition, nanoparticles can have numerous other harmful effects because they can impair the function of our blood cells and the coagulation system (22).
But it gets infinitely worse: Basic knowledge in medicine includes the fact that all soluble substances that are injected into a muscle get into the bloodstream and are distributed throughout the body in a very short time. It is precisely for this reason that substances that should work immediately are injected into the muscles.
It is known that the sprayed gene packages also get into the blood (23). Which cell types will they take in, how will they process them and how will they produce the virus protein? The answer is: Nothing is known for sure. We are now witnessing large-scale tests on humans. That is absolutely irresponsible, especially since there was reason for caution right from the start. The possible dangers of the "packaging" were known.
More importantly, alarming antibody-dependent enhancement effects have been observed in research into SARS and other coronaviruses in animals (24, 25). In the decades of unsuccessful efforts to develop a vaccine against SARS and MERS, these intensifying effects were among the numerous problems (26). Against this background, shouldn't animal experiments have had to be carried out in order to clearly exclude them for SARS-CoV-2? The fact is that scientific publications on the subject do not exist. Doctors who fail to make vaccinees aware of the risk that the vaccination could lead to worse disease progression violated their duty to provide information (27).
And more seriously: Could the inoculation of virus genes trigger other, novel immune-related amplification effects? Shouldn't very elementary things have to be considered and checked beforehand?

As a reminder (see also the online chapter "Immunity"): Lymphocytes have a long-term memory - they remember what corona junk looks like. And corona trash looks pretty similar, no matter which family member it comes from. All people have completed training rounds with coronaviruses and have lymphocytes that recognize SARS-CoV-2 garbage. Some might reply that these cross-reactive killer lymphocytes were only detected in 40 to 70 percent of the old blood samples and that they only reacted weakly to SARS-CoV-2 (28, 29). However, it is known that there is always only a small proportion of all lymphocytes in the blood. The others are just taking a break and are resting in the lymphatic organs (including the lymph nodes).
Exciting: In April 2020, Swedish researchers reported that they had discovered something remarkable. Regardless of the severity of the SARS-CoV-2 disease, all people (100 percent) had troubled, agitated T lymphocytes in the blood (30).
This finding is a wink from the fence post. Because when the immune system encounters a virus for the first time, the lymphocyte response is sluggish. Fast, strong reactions reveal that troops that have been warned are already at their feet and can be mobilized at any time. They then swarm out of the lymphatic organs to fight the enemy. Your main task: wiping out the virus factories Death of your own cells that produce the viruses.
And now back to the new reality, the large-scale test on people. The injected gene packets are taken up locally in muscle cells, but a large part of it ends up in the local lymph nodes and the bloodstream. The entire immune team sits in the lymph nodes. This cell will then produce the virus protein and display the garbage it generates on its surface. This cell will then display the virus protein on its surface. The corona-specialized killer lymphocyte next door jumps up - it has discovered a virus factory and will destroy it. The fratricidal battle begins, immune cell against immune cell! Lymph node swelling could be a sign of this reaction. Plus pain. The lymphocytes stimulate each other and then pour out of the lymph nodes to track down other enemies.

You find these in the muscle cells that put the corona garbage in front of the door and go into attack mode. Redness, swelling and pain develop at the injection site.
But now the nightmare begins. The smallest substances such as sugar can seep out of the blood into the tissue, whereas large molecules such as proteins cannot. The vessel walls are tight for them thanks to the lining with a layer of cells - the endothelial cells.
How are the gene packages made - big or small? Correct: relatively very large. So once they get into the blood, like the blood cells, they will remain in the closed network of vascular tubes. A small part of them are taken up by white blood cells. Presumably, however, most of the virus factories will be built in the endothelial cells. This would mainly happen where the blood flows slowly - in the small and smallest vessels - because the gene packets can be taken up by the cells particularly efficiently there (31).
The cells then place the waste in front of the door - to the vessel lumen (to the vessel opening). The killer lymphocytes are on patrol there. This time the fight is one-sided. The endothelial cells have no defense against the attack by the killer cells.
One can only guess what happens then. The destruction of endothelial cells and the associated damage to the vascular lining usually lead to blood clotting and the formation of clots. This would happen in innumerable vessels in innumerable places in the body. If it happens in the placenta, severe damage to the child in the womb could result. If it happens in other organs, including the heart, brain and spinal cord, all conceivable consequences are possible.
Is there any evidence that something like this is happening? Yes, we are talking about rare blood diseases for which a possible connection to vaccination would have to be examined (32). Reports from patients in whom a sharp drop in blood platelets (thrombocytes) has been observed are conspicuous. That would fit the hypothesis set out here, because platelets are activated and consumed at the locations where the clot is formed.
It would be easy to check whether the assumption is correct. Laboratory results immediately provide information about whether the blood has started to clot. Autopsies could clarify whether clots have formed in the small vessels. And in the meantime, consideration might be given to using anticoagulants in patients as a preventative measure. The administration of cortisone preparations to dampen lymphocyte activity could also be worth considering.

The fact is that vaccination-related deaths are ongoing worldwide. Officially it is said that of course the vaccination has nothing to do with the deaths.
Almost all of them are elderly people with numerous previous illnesses who would have died soon anyway. If that should actually be the case, no thinking and compassionate person will understand why they then had to be vaccinated - with a hardly characterized vaccine.
In a frail person, what could lead to death hours and days after vaccination? Several possibilities are conceivable:
Stress from the vaccination itself. Allergic reactions.
Autoimmune attack. Lymphocytes can also be used in old age. For older people with previous illnesses, the attack on the virus factories could be the last drop that brings the barrel to overflowing.
It gets a little more complicated when a real infection comes into play. Several nursing homes apparently had Covid-19 outbreaks just in the days after residents were vaccinated. It can be described as noticeable that up to this point in time there had hardly been any cases in the entire area and that all hygiene measures had been observed. Even after the second vaccination, there were outbreaks (33,34), a clear and expected indication that the vaccination does not protect against infection.

It also seems as if the vaccinated are dying. Is this perhaps the immune-related disease exacerbation we have to fear? Now not caused by antibodies, but by applied killer lymphocytes? And couldn't that happen to everyone vaccinated at any time - tomorrow, the day after tomorrow, next week, next autumn? Because lymphocytes have an elephant memory. And they recognize something that looks similar to all coronaviruses: garbage. That is, the lymphocyte-related exacerbation of the course of the disease could probably occur with any infection with a related virus. For every “successfully” vaccinated person - whether young or old - and at any time in the near or distant future.

https://kenfm.de/der-impfrausch-von-sucharit-bhakdi-und.../
But he has nothing on at all, cried at last the whole people....

User avatar
David McCarthy
Site Admin
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:09 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: mRNA Vaccine Safety - Denmark Ditches J&J COVID Vaccine, Says Benefits ‘Do Not Outweigh Risk’ of Blood Clots

Unread post by David McCarthy » Mon May 03, 2021 9:52 pm

05/03/21

Denmark Ditches J&J COVID Vaccine, Says Benefits ‘Do Not Outweigh Risk’ of Blood Clots
The Danish Health Authority today said it won’t use the Johnson & Johnson shot, citing a possible link to blood clots. The move follows the decision last month to dump AstraZeneca’s vaccine over similar concerns.
By
Megan Redshaw


Denmark on Monday became the first country to exclude Johnson & Johnson’s (J&J) COVID vaccine from its vaccination program over a potential link to blood clotting disorders.The Danish Health Authority said in a statement it had concluded “the benefits of using the COVID-19 vaccine from J&J do not outweigh the risk of causing the possible adverse effect in those who receive the vaccine,” Reuters reported.
Danish health officials noted the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) conclusion that “there is a possible link between rare but severe cases of blood clots and the COVID-19 vaccine from J&J,” referring to an investigation last month into eight U.S. reports of rare blood clots — one of which was fatal — that occurred after recent vaccination.
Unlike the Danish Health Authority however, the EMA concluded the benefits of using the J&J vaccine outweigh the risks. The EMA did recommend adding a warning to J&J’s vaccine label, and the company said it would comply with that measure.
“Taking the present situation in Denmark into account, what we are currently losing in our effort to prevent severe illness from COVID-19 cannot outweigh the risk of causing possible side effects in the form of severe blood clots in those we vaccinate,” the health authority said.
Denmark stopped using AstraZeneca’s vaccine last month after European regulators found a possible link between AstraZeneca’s COVID vaccine and “very rare” blood clots.
Both J&J and AstraZeneca vaccines use a modified adenovirus vector technology as opposed to the mRNA technology used in the Moderna and Pfizer’s COVID vaccines.

The EMA noted in its findings on the J&J vaccine that one plausible explanation for the combination of blood clots and low blood platelets could be an immune response leading to a condition similar to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Scientists in Norway and Germany who studied blood clots after vaccination with AstraZeneca suggested some people may experience an abnormal immune response causing them to form antibodies that attack their own platelets after being vaccinated.
It’s not yet clear if there might be a similar mechanism with the J&J vaccine, but J&J and AstraZeneca vaccines, as well as Russia’s COVID vaccine and China’s, are made with the same technology.
On April 13, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevent (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) called for an immediate halt to the use of J&J’s COVID vaccine, marketed under the company’s Janssen subsidiary, while they investigated at least six cases of potentially dangerous blood clots in people who received the vaccine. All six occurred in women between the ages of 18 and 48, and symptoms occurred six to 13 days after vaccination. One death was reported.

As The Defender reported, one of the six cases included a Nevada teen who underwent three brain surgeries to repair blood clots she developed about a week after being vaccinated.
On April 14, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) postponed a vote on whether to lift the pause on the J&J vaccine, effectively extending the pause pending further analysis of data relating to blood clots in people who received the vaccine.
That same day, J&J revealed two more cases of blood clots — one in a 25-year-old man who suffered a cerebral hemorrhage during a clinical trial and another case of deep-vein-thrombosis in a 59-year-old woman.
On April 23, the ACIP voted 10 – 4 to lift the pause and continue use of the J&J shot without restrictions or an additional warning about the risk of blood clotting disorders after analyzing 15 cases of rare blood clots, including three deaths, according to a slide presentation shared during the meeting.
The ACIP said the link between blood clots and J&J’s COVID vaccine was “plausible,” but concluded the vaccine’s benefits outweigh the risks and recommended the vaccine for persons 18 years of age and older in the U.S. under the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).
Children’s Health Defense queried the VAERS data for a series of adverse events associated with the formation of clotting disorders and other related conditions. VAERS yielded a total of 1,845 reports for all three vaccines from Dec. 14, 2020, through April 23.
Of the 1,845 cases reported, there were 655 reports attributed to Pfizer, 577 reports to Moderna and 608 reports to J&J. U.S. health officials only acknowledged 15 blood clot cases associated with the J&J vaccine at the April 16 meeting.
Though J&J and AstraZeneca vaccines have been under the microscope for their potential to cause blood clots, scientists warned, as far back as December 2020, that mRNA vaccines like Pfizer and Moderna pose similar risks.



https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defe ... k-ditches-
But he has nothing on at all, cried at last the whole people....

Post Reply

Return to “Covid 19 Pandemic - mRNA Vaccine Safety - Lockdowns”