FACTNet's article about the Glen Interview

[Whatchamacallit]

http://www.factnet.org/?p=438

Who the #$*! Are They? They are a cult!!!!
FACTNet newseditors note: Doonesbury makes light of Ramtha with his "Boopsie" character! But it is no laughing matter!

Glen Cunningham talks about his involvement with Ramtha's School of Enlightenment (RSE). In this two part video interview Glen talks about his unique experience of being employed by JZ Knight as "Ramtha's" personal bodyguard while a member of RSE. He came to realize that he was involved In a clever and deceptive cult. In this candid interview with David McCarthy, Glen answers questions regarding, How he got involved with RSE, What his experiences were while he was employed there, especially that caused him to leave, And what he learned of the workings of RSE while he was employed there. This interview is based on Glen's personal experiences and opinions as related to RSE. Produced by L.A.R.S.E. , D McCarthy 2008 Recommended Reading: "Influence, science and practice" by Robert Cialdini , "Take Back Your Life" by Lalich/Tobias, "Psychology of Totalism" by Robert J. Lifton?

How I was suckered by a 35,000-year-old entity.

Mossback is a cultural conservative. No, not the I-only-listen-to-music-approved-by-Tipper-Gore-and-go-to-movies-rated-godly-by-Michael-Medved type. But I view most public art with great suspicion and rarely go to foreign films that don?t feature swords.

From time to time, though, I weaken and am persuaded to leave the stump for something more mind-broadening and experimental. Most memorable was a performance at On the Boards a few years back that can only be described as "Canadian mime tango." It's hard to imagine three scarier words strung together, except maybe ?big hairy tarantula.?

Last weekend, I was convinced by a blurb in our own listings to see a film called What the #$*! Do We Know?, which sounded like an interesting indie documentary-style film about quantum physics and the meaning of the universe featuring oddly, I thought the deaf Oscar winner, Marlee Matlin, who seemed a very unlikely figure to be explaining string theory, but what the heck. So our small group trundled up to the Crest Theater in Shoreline, where, back in the early 70s, I used to go to 50-cent weekend double-feature pairings of movies like Breakfast at Tiffany?s with Audrey Hepburn and Five Card Stud with Dean Martin. Talk about cosmic dissonance.

What the #$*! Do We Know? featured a mix of talking heads describing the amazing wonders of the goofy universe of subatomic particles, interspersed with the story of a Portland photographer, played by Matlin, who is chronically depressed but, with the help of a wise, Yoda-like boy, learns to become unstuck in time, shoot hoops, and create her own reality. This enables her to toss the Prozac and get on with a busy life of self-actualization.

A third dimension of the film is its heavy use of computer animation to make its points. This includes a long segment tracking the biological functions of Matlin and others as they attend a Polish wedding. hey, there's the "shy" cell, the "sex" cell, and the "gluttony" cell. It was a like an old Disney-style film about the functions of the human body, Hemo the Magnificent, or Woody Allen's Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex, where we experience an orgasm from inside the body. Only here, everything was imbued with a kind of mystical, rather than salacious, significance.

What I realized as I watched the film is that it isn't a documentary about science at all. In fact, it's a propaganda film with "until the end" a literally hidden agenda. During the movie, I kept thinking that it reminded me of the clever multimedia films you see inside world?s fair pavilions. But who was the Honeywell or Monsanto here?

The presentation was very odd. The talking heads, for example, weren't identified until the final credits, so you tended to listen somewhat credulously to what they were saying before you knew whether the speakers had any authority to be saying it at all. They mostly sounded like scientists, speaking about particle physics. (Matter is really an idea! Stuff can be two places at once!) But strangely, amid all the talking heads, they kept returning to someone who was familiar: JZ Knight, the New Age cult leader and Yelm resident who purports to channel a 35,000-year-old warrior entity named Ramtha.

Mossback's partner whispered that Knight looked and talked like the love child of Zsa Zsa Gabor and William Shatner. She couldn't maintain her Ramtha accent, either, and appeared to have had bad plastic surgery. one would think with her money and connections to Atlantis she could have done better. At any rate, I sat through the film wondering what the hell she was doing there. And who the heck were these other "experts" in the film, and how come quantum mechanics kept turning into quantum metaphysics? Turns out a few were legit scientists and academics, but others had credentials from august entities like a chiropractic school and Maharishi University, where they?re learning to stop crime through meditation. And one theologian turns out to have been a Catholic priest who left the church under a cloud of sex-abuse allegations. A number of those interviewed were connected with Ramtha's School of Enlightenment, run by Knight.

When I got home, I checked the Web and discovered that many other film goers had felt conned by this "independent" film with a stealth agenda. Last September, Salon did a story about the film's Ramtha connections, including its three principal filmmakers, who described themselves as "students of Ramtha," who, they said, is "a being living outside our space/time." Salon described the film as an "infomercial" for Ramtha. Our film listings certainly should have reflected, at the very least, that there was a controversial Knight connection to the film. I know that would have influenced my decision to go.

It wasn't that I was offended by the film's ideas. It's old New Age thinking, spruced up with the gloss of scientific theory. What the #$*! Do We Know?, which one of its makers has described as "a film for the religious left," should be up front about what it is. If it wants to credibly offer an alternative to the American Judeo-Christian model of religion, it should do so without a disguise. Of course, if it did that, it might turn some people off which, of course, is exactly how cults work. They recruit by pretending to be something they?re not.

What the #$*! Do We Know? should come with a warning label. Not for what it tells us but for what it withholds.-Knute Berger, SeattleWeekly.com

IMHO
FACTNet

This editorial/opinion/news alert has been provided or distributed by FACTNet, Inc. (Fight Against Coercive Tactics Network.) Please visit our web site at http://www.factnet.org if you would like to comment on this editorial/opinion/news alert or to share your personal experiences. Re-distribution and re-posting of this document using proper net etiquette when doing so, is appreciated! If you have something you would like Factnet to consider posting in our editorial/opinion/news story email it to manage@factnet.org . Be sure to put Factnet Story Submission in the subject line so it gets to the proper editors.
Factnet?s mission is to be the largest online news and referral service as well as research archive for defending freedom of thought and mind from all forms of unethical influence tactics, mind control and mental coercion/torture used in destructive cults and fundamentalist groups. Since 1993 millions have been helped. FACTNet is a tax deductible, IRS Approved 501(c)(3) non profit organization. For breaking news, personal stories, recovery information, support groups, and expert referrals relating to our mission please visit our web site at http://www.factnet.org If you would like to view over 350,000 postings on various cults, comment on this editorial/opinion/news or to share your personal experiences, go to one of our many various message boards at http://www.factnet.org/vbforum
F.A.C.T.Net, Inc. PO Box 1315 , Ignacio, CO. 81137 USA, E-mail: manage@factnet.org


Subscribe to this feed ? Email this ? Add to del.icio.us ? Digg This! ? Technorati Links


Posted by David Pike on October 3, 2008.
Filed under: News Millions Helped
Home

Discussion Board

Current Newsletter

Free Newsletter Subscription

Search

Site Map

Factnet Blog Feed

Factnet Blog by Email




Espanol

Guide to Cults
Signs of a Destructive Cult

What is Mind Control?

Religious Fundamentalism

Cult Groups List

Terrorism Cults

Child Abuse in Cults

Cult Recovery Books

Terrorism Books

Spiritual Safeguards

Cult Discussion Board

Guide to Cult Recovery
The Cult Healing Hub

Cult Discussion Board

Cult-Help Experts

Cult-Help Organizations

Cult Support Groups

How to be an Activist

Recommended Books

Internet Resources on Cults

Cult Discussion Board

Guide to Scientology
Scientology & Dianetics

Scientology Celebrities

Newspaper Articles

Scientology Books

All the Sites worth Seeing

Help Factnet
Buy books to donate

Make a $ donation

Buy Goods to donate

Donor & Honor Pages

Create a FACTNet Mirror

Today's News
Cults

Cult News Trackers

Fundamentalism

Mind Control

Terrorism

Scientology

About
Mission

About

FACTNet Constitution

Disclaimer

Contact FACTNet

Ancient History

Newsletter Archives


Factnet Blog Feed

Factnet Blog by Email




Resources
FACTnetF.A.C.T.net Inc.
Fight Against Coercive Tactics Network Since 1993
Since 1993, Discussion, Resources and Support for Recovery from the Abusive Practices of Religions and Cults