Posted: Sat May 02, 2009 1:50 pm
Hello Sad Grandfather
Thanks for your post. I don't mind talking to myself sometimes ... as long as it's not to a 35,000 year old entity or the wind.
Yes, you are a 'bad' influence to your Grandson from his perspective. My closest RSE friend is not talking to me as she did not want me to 'contaminate' her. From RSE teachings, a student does not want to be 'frequency specific' to EMF. It means that the student is creating doubt in the quantum field and will not manifest the incredible. These were my thoughts when I was a 'glazed eyed' fanatical student although I dared to venture into EMFLand. Total quantum B***S***.
Just a bit of background if you are sending this to your Grandson. My husband has an interest in Physics and has studied two years of Physics at college. I also have a science background at college although not majoring in Physics. We often attend public lectures on Physics at the local college. We have attended lectures by these world renowned physicists (eg Roger Penrose, James Gates, Paul Davies etc) when they have visited the college. These are 'real' scientists and their books are NOT recommended readings from RSE. They are NOT the scientists that participated in "What The Bleep". RSE only recommends books by pseudoscientists.
The latest Physics book my husband has bought and read is Quantum Enigma (Physics Encounters Consciousness) by Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner. He highly recommends this book for your Grandson to read as he is going to study Physics at college. Here's a link to the website:
http://quantumenigma.com/
The above book was advertised in the Scientific American MIND April/May 2008 magazine and SEED Sep/Oct 2008 magazine that we came across.
This book, Quantum Enigma 'coincidentally' (unbeknownst to us) mentions "What the Bleep" and "Ramtha" on Pages 4, 156 & 157 (paperback edition). The authors acknowledge that there is no way to interpret Quantum Physics without encountering consciousness. However, they warn against the slippery slope of a spiritual interpretation and consider the quantum channeling of a 35,000 year old Ramtha as nonsense. Further, they suggest the mystical interpretations by the scientists in the movie "What the Bleep" represent only the tiniest fraction of the physics community. Contrast this view against what we are told by Judith/Ramtha who imply it is the greater part of the physics community that support these interpretations. Ironically, it is Fred Alan Wolf, who in the movie "What the Bleep" mentions that Quantum Physics is subject to a whole range of debatable interpretations. Just pick one that agrees with Judith/Ramtha teachings, and away you go.
Accordingly, you won't find this book on Judith's recommended reading for current victims, oops, i mean students!
By the way, we attended a Quantum Physics lecture by James Gates at our local college. At question time, some armchair physicists asked questions along the lines of what we get taught at RSE. Lets just say you wouldn't ask a second question after his reply.
Caterpillar
Thanks for your post. I don't mind talking to myself sometimes ... as long as it's not to a 35,000 year old entity or the wind.
Yes, you are a 'bad' influence to your Grandson from his perspective. My closest RSE friend is not talking to me as she did not want me to 'contaminate' her. From RSE teachings, a student does not want to be 'frequency specific' to EMF. It means that the student is creating doubt in the quantum field and will not manifest the incredible. These were my thoughts when I was a 'glazed eyed' fanatical student although I dared to venture into EMFLand. Total quantum B***S***.
Just a bit of background if you are sending this to your Grandson. My husband has an interest in Physics and has studied two years of Physics at college. I also have a science background at college although not majoring in Physics. We often attend public lectures on Physics at the local college. We have attended lectures by these world renowned physicists (eg Roger Penrose, James Gates, Paul Davies etc) when they have visited the college. These are 'real' scientists and their books are NOT recommended readings from RSE. They are NOT the scientists that participated in "What The Bleep". RSE only recommends books by pseudoscientists.
The latest Physics book my husband has bought and read is Quantum Enigma (Physics Encounters Consciousness) by Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner. He highly recommends this book for your Grandson to read as he is going to study Physics at college. Here's a link to the website:
http://quantumenigma.com/
The above book was advertised in the Scientific American MIND April/May 2008 magazine and SEED Sep/Oct 2008 magazine that we came across.
This book, Quantum Enigma 'coincidentally' (unbeknownst to us) mentions "What the Bleep" and "Ramtha" on Pages 4, 156 & 157 (paperback edition). The authors acknowledge that there is no way to interpret Quantum Physics without encountering consciousness. However, they warn against the slippery slope of a spiritual interpretation and consider the quantum channeling of a 35,000 year old Ramtha as nonsense. Further, they suggest the mystical interpretations by the scientists in the movie "What the Bleep" represent only the tiniest fraction of the physics community. Contrast this view against what we are told by Judith/Ramtha who imply it is the greater part of the physics community that support these interpretations. Ironically, it is Fred Alan Wolf, who in the movie "What the Bleep" mentions that Quantum Physics is subject to a whole range of debatable interpretations. Just pick one that agrees with Judith/Ramtha teachings, and away you go.
Accordingly, you won't find this book on Judith's recommended reading for current victims, oops, i mean students!
By the way, we attended a Quantum Physics lecture by James Gates at our local college. At question time, some armchair physicists asked questions along the lines of what we get taught at RSE. Lets just say you wouldn't ask a second question after his reply.
Caterpillar