Scott Carney The Brainwashing Cult of Joe Dispenza

[David McCarthy]

The Brainwashing Cult of Joe Dispenza -
Scott Carney
n 1985 a scientist in France named René Peoc'h very nearly proved that love can alter the quantum state of matter with an ingenious experiment involving newly hatched chickens and a robot. If you think that sounds unbelievable, then just you wait until you find out what the chiropractor to the stars Joe Dispenza did with the results.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cc47pOGXleQ

[David McCarthy]

Related:

did Rene Peoc'h fake the results of a Chicken-Robot Interaction study?

French researcher René Peoc'h's 1995 study claimed chicks could influence the movement of a robot by their collective intention, but these results are considered unproven and unreplicable. The study's results, which suggested chicks could "pull" a light-bearing robot closer to them, were statistically significant in Peoc'h's work but have not been successfully and credibly repeated by other researchers.

AI overview.

While it is not confirmed that René Peoc'h faked the results of his chicken-robot interaction study, the experiments are widely dismissed as pseudoscience and severely lack scientific credibility
. The experiments were not independently replicated, and Peoc'h's refusal to allow external observers opened the door to accusations of fabricated results.
Details of the study and its reception
The experiment

Method: In the 1980s, French researcher René Peoc'h claimed to demonstrate psychokinesis in baby chicks. He imprinted chicks onto a robot that moved based on a random event generator (REG).
Hypothesis: Peoc'h hypothesized that the chicks' desire to stay near their "mother" robot could influence the REG, causing the robot to spend more time closer to the chicks' cage.
Results: Peoc'h reported that in a significant number of trials, the robot's movement was non-random and biased toward the chicks, while control groups with non-imprinted chicks or no chicks showed random movement.

Criticisms and lack of scientific rigor

Control issues: A core problem was that Peoc'h's protocol was not transparent and lacked external controls to ensure the robot's movement was genuinely random and not influenced by any hidden biases.
Unreplicated results: The dramatic, paranormal-seeming results of the study have never been successfully or credibly replicated by other researchers.
Accusations of fabrication: Peoc'h refused to let independent researchers observe the experiments, leading to speculation that his results were fabricated or the product of flawed methodology. Critics noted that the robot could have simply been avoiding the chicks if they were wandering loosely, or that limited-time random generation can produce seemingly non-random patterns.
Parapsychology context: The study is often mentioned alongside other controversial parapsychology research, such as that conducted at the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) lab, which also drew strong criticism for poor methodology.

Broader context
The controversy surrounding Peoc'h's experiment highlights broader issues in parapsychology research. While outright fraud is sometimes alleged, it is more common for critics to cite poor experimental design, confirmation bias, and the inability to replicate unusual findings as reasons to reject a study's paranormal claims. Peoc'h's work is considered an example of pseudoscience, as it makes extraordinary claims that have not withstood scientific scrutiny.